Aluminum hydroxide (Al(OH)3) and aluminum phosphate (AlPO4) are widely used adjuvants in human vaccines. However, a rationale to choose one or the other is lacking since the differences between molecular mechanisms of action of these adjuvants are unknown. In the current study, we compared the innate immune response induced by both adjuvants in vitro and in vivo. Proteome analysis of human primary monocytes was used to determine the immunological pathways activated by these adjuvants. Subsequently, analysis of immune cells present at the site of injection and proteome analysis of the muscle tissue revealed the differentially regulated processes related to the innate immune response in vivo. Incubation with Al(OH)3 specifically enhanced the activation of antigen processing and presentation pathways in vitro. In vivo experiments showed that only intramuscular (I.M.) immunization with Al(OH)3 attracted neutrophils, while I.M. immunization with AlPO4 attracted monocytes/macrophages to the site of injection. In addition, only I.M. immunization with Al(OH)3 enhanced the process of hemostasis after 96 hours, possibly related to neutrophilic extracellular trap formation. Both adjuvants differentially regulated various immune system-related processes. The results show that Al(OH)3 and AlPO4 act differently on the innate immune system. We speculate that these different regulations affect the interaction with cells, due to the different physicochemical properties of both adjuvants.
Keywords: Aluminum hydroxide; Aluminum phosphate; Innate immune response(s); Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS); Vaccine adjuvants.
Copyright © 2022 American Pharmacists Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.