Monitoring the effects of therapeutic interventions in depression through self-assessments

Ines Moragrega; René Bridler; Christine Mohr; Michela Possenti; Deborah Rochat; Judit Sanchez Parramon; Hans H Stassen

doi:10.4081/ripppo.2021.548

Monitoring the effects of therapeutic interventions in depression through self-assessments

Res Psychother. 2021 Dec 20;24(3):548. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2021.548.

Authors

Ines Moragrega¹, René Bridler², Christine Mohr³, Michela Possenti⁴, Deborah Rochat³, Judit Sanchez Parramon¹, Hans H Stassen⁵

Affiliations

¹ Department of Psychobiology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
² Sanatorium Kilchberg, Kilchberg, Switzerland.
³ Department of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
⁴ Department of Psychology, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
⁵ Institute for Response-Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Abstract

The treatment of major psychiatric disorders is an arduous and thorny path for the patients concerned, characterized by polypharmacy, massive adverse side effects, modest prospects of success, and constantly declining response rates. The more important is the early detection of psychiatric disorders prior to the development of clinically relevant symptoms, so that people can benefit from early interventions. A well-proven approach to monitoring mental health relies on voice analysis. This method has been successfully used with psychiatric patients to 'objectively' document the progress of improvement or the onset of relapse. The studies with psychiatric patients over 2-4 weeks demonstrated that daily voice assessments have a notable therapeutic effect in themselves. Therefore, daily voice assessments appear to be a lowthreshold form of therapeutic means that may be realized through self-assessments. To evaluate performance and reliability of this approach, we have carried out a longitudinal study on 82 university students in 3 different countries with daily assessments over 2 weeks. The sample included 41 males (mean age 24.2±3.83 years) and 41 females (mean age 21.6±2.05 years). Unlike other research in the field, this study was not concerned with the classification of individuals in terms of diagnostic categories. The focus lay on the monitoring aspect and the extent to which the effects of therapeutic interventions or of behavioural changes are visible in the results of self-assessment voice analyses. The test persons showed an over-proportionally good adherence to the daily voice analysis scheme. The accumulated data were of generally high quality: sufficiently high signal levels, a very limited number of movement artifacts, and little to no interfering background noise. The method was sufficiently sensitive to detect: i) habituation effects when test persons became used to the daily procedure; and ii) short-term fluctuations that exceeded prespecified thresholds and reached significance. Results are directly interpretable and provide information about what is going well, what is going less well, and where there is a need for action. The proposed self-assessment approach was found to be well-suited to serve as a health-monitoring tool for subjects with an elevated vulnerability to psychiatric disorders or to stress-induced mental health problems. Daily voice assessments are in fact a low-threshold form of therapeutic means that can be realized through selfassessments, that requires only little effort, can be carried out in the test person's own home, and has the potential to strengthen resilience and to induce positive behavioural changes.

Keywords: Psychiatric disorders; biofeedback; depression; early detection; psychosomatic disturbances; selfmonitoring; stress-related health problems; university students; voice analysis.