Background and objectives: Evidence regarding redo percutaneous interventions for recurrent mitral regurgitation is scarce. We ought to evaluate procedural and clinical outcomes of repeated edge-to-edge transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) interventions.
Methods: This multicenter study collected individual data from eight high-volume TMVR Centers in Spain. Between 2012 and 2020, all patients undergoing a second edge-to-edge TMVR intervention (Redo) were included in the study.
Results: Among a total of 1028 procedures, 31 patients (3%) with residual MR ≥ 3 at follow-up underwent a second procedure (Redo). Redo intervention was mainly conducted between the first and second year after the first procedure. The most common cause of MR progression was partial detachment (46.7%) followed by LV remodeling (35.5%). Procedural success was achieved in 87% of cases. After a mean follow-up of 1.75 ± 1.54 years, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were 48.1% and 25%, respectively. Nearly half of the patients (48.1%) required at least one hospital admission for CHF within the follow-up period. However, most of the patients presented symptomatic improvement as depicted by an NYHA class ≤2. Elective mitral surgery was conducted in only one patient at follow-up due to insufficient MR reduction.
Conclusions: According to our findings, redo edge-to-edge TMVR interventions were feasible and safe with a high procedural success rate. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up showed however modest long-term results in this specific setting.
Keywords: mitral valve disease (MVD); mitral valve disease (MVPI); percutaneous intervention; structural heart disease intervention (SHDI).
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.