A comparative analysis of titanium anatomic plate and titanium reconstructive plate for treatment of extra-articular fractures of the scapula (Miller types IIb, IIc, and IV)

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jun;31(6):1175-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.008. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

Abstract

Background: Because of the irregular shape of the scapula and the different types of fractures, a standard internal fixation device is lacking in clinical practice, even though there are many options available. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of titanium anatomic and reconstructive plates for extra-articular fractures of the scapula (Miller types IIb, IIc, and IV).

Methods: A retrospective study of 41 patients who underwent treatment for extra-articular fractures of the scapula between March 2017 and March 2020 was conducted. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the fixation device: titanium anatomic plate group (20 patients) and titanium reconstructive plate group (21 patients). After follow-up for 12-18 months, the general characteristics, perioperative characteristics, postoperative follow-up findings, and imaging data of the 2 groups were compared.

Results: The surgical procedures were uneventful in both groups. The anatomic plate group significantly outperformed the reconstructive plate group with respect to surgical duration and intraoperative blood loss (P < .001). At 3-month postoperative follow-up, the Constant-Murley score (P = .026), shoulder flexion range of motion, and shoulder abduction range of motion in the anatomic plate group were all significantly better than those in the reconstructive plate group (P < .001). The postoperative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability scores of the 2 groups were similar. Imaging showed functional recovery and stable and reliable fixation in both groups. Time to bone union was similar in both groups (9.10 ± 1.25 weeks in anatomic plate group and 9.24 ± 1.41 weeks in reconstructive plate group, P = .742). No complications occurred in any patient, such as fixation failure, instability, or bone nonunion.

Conclusion: Surgeons should favorably consider titanium anatomic plates for the treatment of extra-articular scapular fractures owing to their clear efficacy associated with a shorter surgical time, less intraoperative blood loss, better fixation, and rapid short-term functional recovery.

Keywords: Titanium; articular range of motion; bone fractures; bone plates; shoulder; surgical blood loss.

MeSH terms

  • Blood Loss, Surgical
  • Bone Plates
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / methods
  • Fractures, Bone* / surgery
  • Humans
  • Joint Instability*
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Scapula / diagnostic imaging
  • Scapula / surgery
  • Shoulder Joint* / diagnostic imaging
  • Shoulder Joint* / surgery
  • Titanium
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Titanium