Primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the breast and neuroendocrine differentiated breast cancers: Relationship between histopathological and radiological features

Eur J Radiol. 2022 Feb:147:110148. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110148. Epub 2022 Jan 4.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study wasto investigate whole-breast imaging findings (mammography, ultrasonography (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),clinical, and histopathological findings of primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the breast (NEC) and neuroendocrine differentiated breast cancers (NEBC).

Methods: Patients withadiagnosis of breast cancer with histopathological neuroendocrine features between the years 2010 and 2021 were retrospectively screened.The lesions were divided into two main groups depending on staining with neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin and chromogranin A). Those showing focal staining were categorized as NEBC while those with diffuse staining as NEC.The mammography, US, and MRI of the lesionswere reviewed in consensus by two breast radiologists in order to assess imaging featuresretrospectively according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 5th lexicon.The findings were compared with breast cancers without neuroendocrine features (BC-WNE) which were randomly selected from the same database.

Results: A total of 105 lesions [NEBC (n = 44), NEC(n = 11), BC-WNE (n = 50)] were evaluated.Patients with neuroendocrine tumors were older (p < 0.001) than those with BC-WNE. Compared with BC-WNE tumors, radiological findings typical of malignancy such as irregular shape [NEBC (7/20); NEC(3/7) vs BC-WNE (35/43); p < 0.001], spiculation [NEBC (2/20); NEC(0/7) vs BC-WNE (21/43); p < 0.001], architectural distortion [(NEBC (3/24); NEC(0/9) vs BC-WNE (31/50); p < 0.001)], calcification [(NEBC (6/24), NEC(0/9) vs BC-WNE (n = 27/50); p = 0.001)] on mamography, non-parallel orientation to skin [(NEBC (n = 17/29), NEC(n = 4/9), BC-WNE (n = 35/42); p = 0.008)], acoustic shadowing [(NEBC (n = 12/29), NEC(1/9), BC-WNE (n = 29/42); p = 0.009)], axillary lymphadenopathy [(NEBC(n = 3/30), NEC(n = 1/9), BC-WNE (21/50); p < 0.001)]on US were less common features of the neuroendocrine carcinomas of breast. Aside from shape features, there was no significant difference in contrast pattern (p = 0.866), kinetic curve (p = 0.454) and diffusion restriction (p = 0.242) on MRI.

Conclusion: Characteristic malignant imaging features, including irregular shape, spiculated margins, suspicious calcifications, and posterior acoustic shadowing, are uncommon in neuroendocrine carcinomas of breast. These carcinomas tend to show more benign imaging features when compared with BC-WNE.

Keywords: Breast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography; Neuroendocrine carcinoma; Ultrasonography.

MeSH terms

  • Breast
  • Breast Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging
  • Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine* / diagnostic imaging
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Mammography
  • Retrospective Studies