In-Office Needle Arthroscopy Can Evaluate Meniscus Tear Repair Healing as an Alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Alex C DiBartola; Alan Rogers; Peter Kurzweil; Michael V Knopp; David C Flanigan

doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2021.08.003

In-Office Needle Arthroscopy Can Evaluate Meniscus Tear Repair Healing as an Alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Sep 14;3(6):e1755-e1760. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.08.003. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Authors

Alex C DiBartola¹, Alan Rogers², Peter Kurzweil³, Michael V Knopp^{2

4}, David C Flanigan^{1

5

6}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopaedics.
² Department of Radiology.
³ Memorial Orthopaedic Surgical Group, Long Beach, California, U.S.A.
⁴ Wright Center of Innovation.
⁵ Department of Orthopaedics Sports Medicine.
⁶ Cartilage Restoration Program, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the healing of horizontal cleavage tears of the meniscus 1 year after surgical repair and to determine what modality is best to determine healing.

Methods: Patients were prospectively followed for 12 months after surgical meniscus repair using a circumferential compression stitch. Inclusion criteria were preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of horizontal cleavage tear, age between 18 and 50 years, and no concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patients were excluded if they were >50 years old, had a meniscus tear pattern other than horizontal cleavage tear, and underwent concomitant ligament reconstruction. MRIs were performed 1-year postoperatively for evaluation of repair healing. Preoperative and postoperative MRIs of tears were evaluated blindly by a musculoskeletal radiologist. In-office needle arthroscopy was performed at 6 months post-operatively.

Results: Eight patients were included and had surgery between March 2016 and November 2017. There were 4 medial and 4 lateral meniscus tears. No patients had recurrence of preoperative symptoms or evidence of retear. Six repairs evaluated by in-office needle (at 5.9 months postsurgery) arthroscopy demonstrated complete healing. Seven of the 8 patients had grade III changes on preoperative MRI, and 1 patient had grade IIc changes. On postoperative MRI, 5 of 7 patients had grade III changes, 1 patient had IIc changes, and 1 had IIb changes. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with grade III changes preoperatively compared with postoperatively (P = .57). One of 8 patients with preoperative MRIs demonstrated extrusion where no patients demonstrate postoperative MRI evidence of extrusion (P = .47).

Conclusions: Horizontal cleavage meniscal tears repaired with a circumferential compression stitch demonstrate healing on in-office needle arthroscopy 6 months after surgery. No evidence of incomplete or failed healing was found. MRI at 1 year after surgery demonstrated residual tear evidence for all patients.

Level of evidence: IV, therapeutic case series.