Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Non-Metastatic Rectal Cancer

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Dec 1;22(12):3967-3975. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.12.3967.

Abstract

Background: Rectal cancer is a pervasive type of malignancy that accounts for one-third of colorectal cancers worldwide. Several studies have assessed the use of laparoscopic surgery as a treatment option. However, there is an ongoing debate regarding its oncological safety.

Methods: This retrospective study included 270 patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer who underwent either laparoscopic resection (LR, n = 93) or open resection (OR, n = 177) in an academic medical center. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), whereas the secondary outcome was postoperative complications. We performed propensity score analyses and compared outcomes. Univariate survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard regression models were also conducted.

Results: In the propensity score matching analyses, 93 LR- and 93 OR-matched patients were compared. The overall median follow-up time was 3.95 years (range, 1.98‒5.55 years). The 3-year OS was similar between the groups (LR 79.1% vs OR 79.2%, p = 0.82). Meanwhile, the DFS rate was also comparable between the groups (LR 77.8% vs OR 73.2%, p = 0.53). No significant differences in operative blood loss or hospital stay between the groups were observed (150 vs 150 mL, p = 0.74; 9 vs 10 days, p = 0.077, respectively). Also, no difference was found in postoperative complications between the groups (p = 0.23). However, LR was associated with a longer operative time than OR (455 vs 356 min, p < 0.001) and the number of lymph nodes harvested in LR was slightly fewer than OR (10 vs 11, p = 0.045).

Conclusion: LR of rectal cancer is safe, feasible, and comparable to standard OR in terms of the oncologic outcomes. However, LR required longer operative times. A well-designed prospective study with a large number of participants and long follow-up period is needed to show significant differences between the two groups.<br />.

Keywords: Laparoscopic TME; Non-metastatic rectal cancer; Overall survival; Propensity score-matched analysis; disease-free survival.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Blood Loss, Surgical
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Laparoscopy / methods*
  • Laparoscopy / mortality
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Operative Time
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Proctectomy / methods*
  • Proctectomy / mortality
  • Propensity Score
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Rectal Neoplasms / mortality
  • Rectal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult