Best Reply Player Against Mixed Evolutionarily Stable Strategy User

Bull Math Biol. 2021 Dec 24;84(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s11538-021-00980-7.

Abstract

We consider matrix games with two phenotypes (players): one following a mixed evolutionarily stable strategy and another one that always plays a best reply against the action played by its opponent in the previous round (best reply player, BR). We focus on iterated games and well-mixed games with repetition (that is, the mean number of repetitions is positive, but not infinite). In both interaction schemes, there are conditions on the payoff matrix guaranteeing that the best reply player can replace the mixed ESS player. This is possible because best reply players in pairs, individually following their own selfish strategies, develop cycles where the bigger payoff can compensate their disadvantage compared with the ESS players. Well-mixed interaction is one of the basic assumptions of classical evolutionary matrix game theory. However, if the players repeat the game with certain probability, then they can react to their opponents' behavior. Our main result is that the classical mixed ESS loses its general stability in the well-mixed population games with repetition in the sense that it can happen to be overrun by the BR player.

Keywords: Dynamical player; Iterated game; Markov model; Mixed strategy; Population game.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biological Evolution
  • Game Theory
  • Mathematical Concepts*
  • Models, Biological*
  • Probability