Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of static computer-navigated implantation with surgical guides, based on a non-radiological method. Traditional measurements with a second cone-beam CT (CBCT) were applied to verify the accuracy.
Methods: A total of thirty template-guided implantations were designed and performed on 15 resin models. Two paralleled bone-level implants were planned in the edentulous space of each model, between which the distance was 4 mm. Postoperative implant positions were detected with both CAD/CAM-based measurements applying an intraoral scanner (3Shape TRIOS) and traditional ways via CBCT. Both methods were conducted with a CAD quality-control, reverse engineering software, Geomagic Studio 2013, comparing the positions with the virtual ones. Statistical analysis was processed with SPSS 23.0 software package.
Results: Measurements using CBCT (control group) showed a trend toward greater deviations when the results were directly compared(P<0.05). In the CAD/CAM-based evaluation of the 30 samples, the mean deviation of the insertion axis from the planned implant axis was 1.134°. The mean deviations of the implant shoulders in the horizontal direction and at the implant apices were 0.447 mm and 0.557 mm, respectively. No significant difference was observed when measuring distance deviation with the two assessment ways.
Conclusions: Compared with evaluation based on radiology, CAD/CAM based evaluation system is able to evaluate implant accuracy precisely, effectively reduce radiological exposure of patients, being suitable for clinical evaluation.