Citizen journalism reduces the credibility deficit of authoritarian government in risk communication amid COVID-19 outbreaks

PLoS One. 2021 Dec 8;16(12):e0260961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260961. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

During the outbreak of an epidemic, the success in risk communications to make the public comply with disease preventive measures depends on the public's trust in the government. In this study, we aim to understand how media audiences update their trust in the government during the COVID-19 outbreak depending on the information they received. We conducted an online survey experiment in February 2020 in Hong Kong (n = 1,016) in which respondents were randomly provided with a government press release and an endorsement either from an official or a non-official source. This study shows that the information from a non-official source enhances the credibility of official government messages. Our findings imply that dictators can actually "borrow credibility" from their citizen journalists and even nondemocratic leaders can make themselves more trustworthy to potential dissenters through citizen journalism. Allowing information flow from non-official sources can be a practical measure for governments to address the problem of a credibility deficit during a pandemic.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19 / epidemiology*
  • COVID-19 / virology
  • Disease Outbreaks
  • Government
  • Hong Kong / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Risk
  • SARS-CoV-2 / isolation & purification
  • Social Control, Formal*
  • Social Media*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Grants and funding

Support for this research was provided by the Ministry of Education (Taiwan, ROC, 109L900203) and the Ministry of Science and Technology (Taiwan, ROC, MOST 109-2634-F-002-045) to HHT. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.