Estimating urine volume from the urine creatinine concentration

Abstract

Spot determinations of the urine creatinine concentration are widely used as a substitute for 24-h urine collections. Expressed as the amount excreted per gram of creatinine, urine concentrations in a single-voided sample are often used to estimate 24-h excretion rates of protein, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, urea and uric acid. These estimates are predicated on the assumption that daily creatinine excretion equals 1 g (and that a urine creatinine concentration of 100 mg/dL reflects a 1 L 24-h urine volume). Such estimates are invalid if the serum creatinine concentration is rising or falling. In addition, because creatinine excretion is determined by muscle mass, the assumption that 24-h urine creatinine excretion equals 1 g yields a misleading estimate at the extremes of age and body size. In this review, we evaluate seven equations for the accuracy of their estimates of urine volume based on urine creatinine concentrations in actual and idealized patients. None of the equations works well in patients who are morbidly obese or in patients with markedly decreased muscle mass. In other patients, estimates based on a reformulation of the Cockroft-Gault equation are reasonably accurate. A recent study based on this relationship found a high strength of correlation between estimated and measured urine output with chronic kidney disease (CKD) studied in the African American Study of Kidney Disease (AASK) trial and for the patients studied in the CKD Optimal Management with Binders and NictomidE (COMBINE) trial. However, the equation systematically underestimated urine output in the AASK trial. Hence, an intercept was added to account for the bias in the estimated output. A more rigorous equation derived from an ambulatory Swiss population, which includes body mass index and models the non-linear accelerated decline in creatinine excretion with age, could potentially be more accurate in overweight and elderly patients. In addition to extremes of body weight and muscle mass, decreased dietary intake or reduced hepatic synthesis of creatine, a precursor of creatinine or ingestion of creatine supplements will also result in inaccurate estimates. These limitations must be appreciated to rationally use predictive equations to estimate urine volume. If the baseline urine creatinine concentration is determined in a sample of known volume, subsequent urine creatinine concentrations will reveal actual urine output as well as the change in urine output. Given the constraints of the various estimating equations, a single baseline timed collection may be a more useful strategy for monitoring urine volume than entering anthropomorphic data into a calculator.

Keywords: GFR; creatine; creatine clearance; creatinine; urine output.