Biomarkers in Ovarian Pathology: From Screening to Diagnosis. Review of the Literature

J Pers Med. 2021 Oct 29;11(11):1115. doi: 10.3390/jpm11111115.

Abstract

Background: Ovarian cancer has a low incidence, but high mortality due to a habitual diagnosis in advanced cancer stages. Currently, used biomarkers have good sensitivity, but low specificity.

Aim: To determine the usefulness of the biomarkers and algorithms used up to now in the screening, diagnosis, response to treatments and identification of recurrence in patients with ovarian masses.

Methodology: Systematic search of publications in English in the Medline-PubMed database with the terms: "biomarkers", "tumour", "tumour biomarkers", "marker", "tumour marker", "ovarian cancer", "ovarian", "Neoplasms", "cancer", CA-125 Antigen; Human Epididymis-specific Protein E4; Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI); Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA); Ovarian Neoplasms. Original articles, clinical trials, reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, published between January 2000 and November 2020, were selected to determine the usefulness (among others) of CA 125 and HE4 antigen in ovarian cancer.

Results: Finally, 39 transcendental publications were selected to write this article to determine the usefulness of tumour markers and algorithms in ovarian cancer.

Conclusions: The usefulness of the tumour markers antigen CA125 and antigen HE4 individually or as a basis for decision-making algorithms has low specificity; however, there is little evidence that confirms their usefulness as markers in ovarian cancer screening.

Keywords: CA125; HE4 antigen; algorithms; biomarkers; ovarian cancer; screening; tumour markers.

Publication types

  • Review