Uses of theory in racial health disparities research: a scoping review and application of public health critical race praxis

Ann Epidemiol. 2022 Feb:66:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.11.007. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

Abstract

Purpose: Given the persistence of racial health disparities, scholars have called for investigations into structural origins of health inequity and deeper engagement with theory. We systematically assessed uses of theory-including theory informed conceptualizations of race and ethnicity, social structure, and racial hierarchy-in epidemiology and other quantitative population health literature on racial health disparities.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review of systematically identified original research articles (n=650) that sought to explain racial health disparities; articles were published in 17 high-impact epidemiology, public health, and social science journals. Trained coders abstracted data from each article. We applied Public Health Critical Race Praxis and an iterative data-charting method to identify key themes.

Results: Only 63 (9.7%) of 650 racial health disparities articles explicitly used theory. Among studies that engaged theory, one third (n=21/63) clearly conceptualized race and/or ethnicity, and a minority theorized social structure (n=19/63; 30%) and/or racial hierarchy as a structural relation (n=4/63; 6%).

Conclusions: There is a pressing need for racial health disparities researchers to unambiguously use theory to conceptualize race and ethnicity in social and historical contexts and explain relational aspects of racial hierarchy. These approaches can better elucidate and inform action on structural determinants of both racial inequity and racial health inequity.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Ethnic groups; Health status disparities; Public health; Racism; Social class; Socioeconomic factors.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Ethnicity
  • Health Status Disparities
  • Healthcare Disparities
  • Humans
  • Minority Groups
  • Population Health*
  • Public Health*
  • Research Design
  • United States