Conventional Varicose Vein Surgery: Comparison between Single versus Staged Surgery Using Patient Reported Outcomes

Abstract

Background: In the Brazilian public health system, conventional surgery is the standard procedure for treatment of varicose veins (VV). We aimed to compare clinical and quality of life (QoL) results of patients subjected to bilateral treatment of VV by a single-procedure or staged-procedure approach.

Methods: A total of 111 patients undergoing bilateral treatment for VV were treated either by a single-surgery or 2 staged procedures (minimal: 30-day interval) depending on institutional protocol. Patients were evaluated with respect to clinical symptoms and quality of life markers before and after treatment, by use of the VEINES-Sym/QoL and EQ5D-5L scores, and these results were then compared between groups.

Results: QoL scores improved in general after treatment. VV specific symptoms and QoL aspects improved equally between the Staged-procedure and Single-surgery groups (VEINES-Sym mean variation 29.7 ± 2.1 vs. 29.9 ± 2.7, respectively; P = 0.340 and VEINES-QoL mean variation 5.5 ± 3.4 vs. 4.5 ± 4.3, respectively; P = 0.369). General QoL, however, showed more improvement in the Staged-procedure than the Single-surgery group (EQD5-5L mean increase 0.1678 ± 0.1555 and 0.0785 ± 0.1384, respectively; P = 0.007). When propensity matched, patient subgroups maintained this same differences in QoL results.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the both the Staged- and Single-surgery approach for VV surgical treatment incur similar improvement in disease-specific QoL, and that the Staged-approach may impose less of a burden in the patients' recovery.