Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) is a surrogate biomarker of eosinophil activation and has considerable potential as a precision medicine biomarker in diseases where eosinophils may play a causative role. Clinical data for EDN have been generated using different quantitative immunoassays, but comparisons between these individual data sets are challenging as no internationally recognised EDN standards or orthogonal methods exist. In this study we aimed to compare commercial EDN assays from ALPCO, MBL, LSBio and CUSABIO for sample commutability. Firstly, we analytically validated the ALPCO enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and demonstrated appropriate analytical characteristics, including an intra/inter-assay precision coefficient-of-variation of between 1.9 and 6.8%. EDN purified from blood proved to be a good quality control material, whereas recombinant EDN, expressed in E.coli, did not react in the ALPCO immunoassay. Using healthy and asthma patient serum samples we confirmed that the ALPCO assay correlated well with the MBL assay, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.92. However, the results from LSBio and CUSABIO assays were not commutable to the other assays.
Keywords: EDN; ELISA; Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin; Validation.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.