Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) exhibit cardiopulmonary abnormalities that could affect the predictability of exercise [Formula: see text] from the Jones corrected partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 (PJCO2) equation (PJCO2 = 5.5 + 0.9 × [Formula: see text] - 2.1 × VT). Since the dead space to tidal volume (VD/VT) calculation also includes [Formula: see text] measurements, estimates of VD/VT from PJCO2 may also be affected. Because using noninvasive estimates of [Formula: see text] and VD/VT could save patient discomfort, time, and cost, we examined whether partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 ([Formula: see text]) and PJCO2 can be used to estimate [Formula: see text] and VD/VT in 13 patients with HFpEF. [Formula: see text] was measured from expired gases measured simultaneously with radial arterial blood gases at rest, constant-load (20 W), and peak exercise. VD/VT[art] was calculated using the Enghoff modification of the Bohr equation, and estimates of VD/VT were calculated using [Formula: see text] (VD/VT[ET]) and PJCO2 (VD/VT[J]) in place of [Formula: see text]. [Formula: see text] was similar to [Formula: see text] at rest (-1.46 ± 2.63, P = 0.112) and peak exercise (0.66 ± 2.56, P = 0.392), but overestimated [Formula: see text] at 20 W (-2.09 ± 2.55, P = 0.020). PJCO2 was similar to [Formula: see text] at rest (-1.29 ± 2.57, P = 0.119) and 20 W (-1.06 ± 2.29, P = 0.154), but underestimated [Formula: see text] at peak exercise (1.90 ± 2.13, P = 0.009). VD/VT[ET] was similar to VD/VT[art] at rest (-0.01 ± 0.03, P = 0.127) and peak exercise (0.01 ± 0.04, P = 0.210), but overestimated VD/VT[art] at 20 W (-0.02 ± 0.03, P = 0.025). Although VD/VT[J] was similar to VD/VT[art] at rest (-0.01 ± 0.03, P = 0.156) and 20 W (-0.01 ± 0.03, P = 0.133), VD/VT[J] underestimated VD/VT[art] at peak exercise (0.03 ± 0.04, P = 0.013). Exercise [Formula: see text] and VD/VT[ET] provides better estimates of [Formula: see text] and VD/VT[art] than PJCO2 and VD/VT[J] does at peak exercise. Thus, estimates of [Formula: see text] and VD/VT should only be used if sampling arterial blood during CPET is not feasible.NEW & NOTEWORTHY [Formula: see text] provides a better estimate of [Formula: see text] than PJCO2 at peak exercise, and VD/VT[ET] provides a better estimate of VD/VT[art] than VD/VT[J] at peak exercise. Although we reported significant correlations, we did not find an identity between [Formula: see text] and estimates of [Formula: see text], nor did we find an identity between VD/VT[art] and estimates of VD/VT[art]. Thus, caution should be taken and estimates of [Formula: see text] and VD/VT should only be used if sampling arterial blood during CPET is not feasible.
Keywords: HFpEF; arterial end-tidal carbon dioxide difference; blood gases; physiological dead space; pulmonary capillary wedge pressure.