Atomic-resolution protein structural models are prerequisites for many downstream activities like structure-function studies or structure-based drug discovery. Unfortunately, this data is often unavailable for some of the most interesting and therapeutically important proteins. Thus, computational tools for building native-like structural models from less-than-ideal experimental data are needed. To this end, interaction homology exploits the character, strength and loci of the sets of interactions that define a structure. Each residue type has its own limited set of backbone angle-dependent interaction motifs, as defined by their environments. In this work, we characterize the interactions of serine, cysteine and S-bridged cysteine in terms of 3D hydropathic environment maps. As a result, we explore several intriguing questions. Are the environments different between the isosteric serine and cysteine residues? Do some environments promote the formation of cystine S-S bonds? With the increasing availability of structural data for water-insoluble membrane proteins, are there environmental differences for these residues between soluble and membrane proteins? The environments surrounding serine and cysteine residues are dramatically different: serine residues are about 50% solvent exposed, while cysteines are only 10% exposed; the latter are more involved in hydrophobic interactions although there are backbone angle-dependent differences. Our analysis suggests that one driving force for -S-S- bond formation is a rather substantial increase in burial and hydrophobic interactions in cystines. Serine and cysteine become less and more, respectively, solvent-exposed in membrane proteins. 3D hydropathic environment maps are an evolving structure analysis tool showing promise as elements in a new protein structure prediction paradigm.
Keywords: Cysteine; Cystine; Hydropathic interactions; Hydrophobic effect; Membrane proteins; Serine; Soluble proteins.
© 2021 The Author(s).