Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on STEMI Networks in Central Romania

Roxana Hodas; Imre Benedek; Nora Rat; Istvan Kovacs; Monica Chitu; Theodora Benedek

doi:10.3390/life11101004

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on STEMI Networks in Central Romania

Life (Basel). 2021 Sep 24;11(10):1004. doi: 10.3390/life11101004.

Authors

Roxana Hodas^{1

2}, Imre Benedek^{1

2}, Nora Rat^{1

2}, Istvan Kovacs^{1

2}, Monica Chitu^{1

2}, Theodora Benedek^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, 540142 Tirgu Mures, Romania.
² Clinic of Cardiology, Emergency Clinical County Hospital, 540136 Tirgu Mures, Romania.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on cardiovascular emergencies. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a regional network for management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods: We report a single center's experience of patients hospitalized for ACS in a high-volume hub of a STEMI network during the lockdown (in the first pandemic trimester), compared with the same time interval of the previous year and including all consecutive patients referred for an AMI during the second trimester of 2020 (from April to June) or during the same time interval of the previous year, 2019.

Results: The absolute number of hospital admissions for AMI decreased by 22.3%, while the non-AMI hospitalizations decreased by 77.14% in Q2-2020 compared to Q2-2019 (210 vs. 48, p < 0.0001). As a consequence, the percentage of AMI cases from the total number of hospital admission increased from 38% to 68% (p < 0.0001), AMI becoming the dominant pathology. In the STEMI group there was a significant reduction of 55% in the absolute number of late STEMI presentations. Functionality of the STEMI network at the hub level did not present a significant alteration with only a minor increase in the door-to-balloon time, from 34 min to 41 min. However, at the level of the network we recorded a lower number of critical cases transferred to the interventional center, with a dramatic reduction of 56.1% in the number of critical STEMI cases arriving in the acute cardiac care unit (17.0% vs. 7.3%, p-0.04 for KILLIP class III, and 21.17% vs. 11.11%, p = 0.08 for resuscitated out of hospital cardiac arrest).

Conclusions: The COVID-19 outbreak did not have a major impact on the interventional center's functionality, but it limited the capacity of the regional STEMI network to bring the critical patient with complicated STEMI to the cathlab in time during the first months of the lockdown. Even a very well-functioning STEMI network like the one in Central Romania had difficulties bringing the most critical STEMI cases to the cathlab in time.

Keywords: COVID-19; STEMI network; acute myocardial infarction.