Normalization of SARS-CoV-2 viral load via RT-qPCR provides higher-resolution data for comparison across time and between patients

Virus Res. 2021 Dec:306:198604. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2021.198604. Epub 2021 Oct 16.

Abstract

The 2020 pandemic has transformed the world and elicited thousands of studies to better understand the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Viral load has been a common measure to monitor treatment therapies and associate viral dynamics with patient outcomes; however, methods associated with viral load have varied across studies. These variations have the potential to sacrifice the accuracy of findings as they often do not account for inter-assay variation or variation across samples. In a retrospective study of nasopharyngeal samples, we found a significant amount of variation within the DNA and RNA targets; for example, across time within a single patient, there was an average of a 32-fold change. Further, we explore the impacts of host normalization on 94 clinical samples using the TGen Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 assay, finding that without host normalization samples with the same viral concentration can have up to 100-fold variation in the viral load.

Keywords: COVID-19; normalization; reference gene; viral concentration; viral dynamic.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19 / virology*
  • COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing / methods*
  • Humans
  • RNA, Viral / genetics
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • SARS-CoV-2 / classification
  • SARS-CoV-2 / genetics*
  • SARS-CoV-2 / isolation & purification
  • SARS-CoV-2 / physiology
  • Viral Load

Substances

  • RNA, Viral