Massive aspiration syndrome: a possible indication for "emergent" veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation?: a case report

J Med Case Rep. 2021 Oct 8;15(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s13256-021-03050-7.

Abstract

Background: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is usually performed in cases of severe respiratory failure in which conventional and advanced mechanical ventilation strategies are ineffective in achieving true lung-protective ventilation, thus triggering ventilatory-induced lung injury. If circulatory failure coexists, veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) may be preferred over VV-ECMO because of its potential for circulatory support. In VA-ECMO, the respiratory contribution is less effective and the complication rate is higher than in the VV configuration.

Case presentation: The authors present a case in which VV-ECMO was performed in an emergency setting to treat a 68-year-old White male patient who experienced acute respiratory failure after massive aspiration. Despite intubation and intensive care unit admission, multiple organ failure occurred suddenly, thus prompting referral to a level-1 trauma center with an ECMO facility. The patient's condition slowly improved with VV-ECMO support along with standard treatment for hemodynamic impairment. VV-ECMO was discontinued on day 8. The patient was extubated on day 14 and discharged home fully recovered 34 days after the event.

Conclusions: Attention was focused on the decision to initiate VV-ECMO support even in the presence of severe hemodynamic derangement, although VA-ECMO could have provided better hemodynamic support but less effective respiratory support.

Keywords: ECMO; ICU; Massive aspiration; Shock.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation*
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Male
  • Respiration, Artificial
  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome* / therapy
  • Respiratory Insufficiency* / etiology
  • Respiratory Insufficiency* / therapy