The best strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in second-line treatment: A network meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: Varieties of systemic treatments in second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have showed an improvement on survival. In this study, we performed a systematic review with a pairwise and bayesian network meta-analysis to rank the best strategy for mCRC patients in second-line treatment.

Methods: A systematic literature search through 2007 was performed to evaluate the association between several treatment combinations and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR) in mCRC patients. Data were carried out and pooled into a statistical indirect comparison with Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

Results: 10 trials totally comprised 4183 patients were included in our study. In NMA, For PFS, Doublet+Bev showed benefits in comparing with Doublet, Doulblet+placebo and Doublet+Ramucirumab. Also, Doublet+Aflibercept demonstrated its superiority in comparing with Doulblet+placebo. For OS, Doublet+Bev represented its superiority when comparing with Double and Doublet+placebo. Doublet+Aflibercept and Doublet+Ramucirumab also done well when opposed to Doublet+placebo. For DCR, Doublet+bev showed unique superiority when compared with Doublet, And Doublet+targeted agent did not represent benefits to each other in DCR. Doublet+bev ranked highest in terms of PFS, OS and DCR followed by Doublet+panitumumab, Doublet+placebo was the lowest in terms of PFS and OS.

Conclusions: Our study shows that Doublet+Bev has the major probability to provide an improvement of survival in patients with mCRC.