Diverse traits of aquatic plants cannot individually explain their consumption by the generalist gastropod Biomphalairia glabrata

PeerJ. 2021 Sep 20:9:e12031. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12031. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Several experimental studies on aquatic plants have reported the prevalence of chemical defense mechanism against herbivory, as opposed to structural, life-forms or other traits. Here, our laboratory feeding experiments and integrative analysis explored the relationship among palatability (fresh or reconstituted plants used as artificial diet) and various chemical/nutritional traits (i.e., contents of dry mass, ash, nitrogen, protein, and phenols) of diverse aquatic plants and their susceptibility to consumption by the generalist gastropod Biomphalaria glabrata. Biomphalaria glabrata consumed all of the assayed aquatic plants in a hierarchical yet generalized way, with the consumption of fresh plants, their reconstituted forms and defensive properties of lipophilic extracts not being significantly correlated with plant physical or chemical traits to determine the feeding preference of the gastropod. Our results do not reveal a prevalence for a specific plant attribute contributing to herbivory. Instead, they indicate that the susceptibility of aquatic plants to generalist consumers is probably related to a combination of their chemical and physical properties, resulting in moderate grazing rates by generalist consumers.

Keywords: Aquatic biology; Chemical defense; Herbivory; Macrophytes; Physical defense; Plant defense; Plant life-form; Secondary metabolites; Structural defense; Susceptibility to herbivory.

Grants and funding

This research was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação Carlos Chagas de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ). Renato Crespo Pereira and Angelica R. Soares received fellowships from the CNPq for Research Productivity. Nathália Nocchi received an undergraduate fellowship from the FAPERJ, Programa Institucional de Bolsas de Iniciação Científica (PIBIC) and Fundação Educacional de Macaé (FUNEMAC). Nathália Nocchi was supported by the Agustín de Betancourt Programme (Cabildo de Tenerife, TFinnova Programme supported by MEDI and FDCAN funds). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.