Identification and clinical significance of somatic oncogenic mutations in epithelial ovarian cancer

Takafumi Watanabe; Hideaki Nanamiya; Yuta Endo; Manabu Kojima; Shinji Nomura; Shigenori Furukawa; Shu Soeda; Hirosumi Tamura; Masae Ryufuku; Daisuke Tanaka; Takao Isogai; Jun-Ichi Imai; Shinya Watanabe; Keiya Fujimori

doi:10.1186/s13048-021-00876-z

Identification and clinical significance of somatic oncogenic mutations in epithelial ovarian cancer

J Ovarian Res. 2021 Oct 6;14(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13048-021-00876-z.

Affiliations

¹ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan. t-wata@fmu.ac.jp.
² Translational Research Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
³ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.

Abstract

Objective: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a heterogeneous disease with diverse clinicopathological features and behaviors, and its heterogeneity may be concerned with the accumulation of multiple somatic oncogenic mutations. The major goals of this study are to systematically perform the comprehensive mutational profiling in EOC patients, and investigate the associations between somatic mutations and clinicopathological characteristics.

Methods: A total of 80 surgical specimens were obtained from EOC patients who had previously undergone primary debulking surgery, and genomic DNAs were extracted from fresh-frozen tissues. We investigated mutational status in hot spot regions of 50 cancer-related genes by targeted next-generation sequencing using an Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 Kit.

Results: Validated mutations were detected in 66 of the 80 tumors (82.5%). The five most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (43.8%), PIK3CA (27.5%), KRAS (23.8%), PTEN (10%) and CTNNB1 (10%). PTEN and CTNNB1 mutations were associated with younger age. PIK3CA1, KRAS and CTNNB1 mutations were observed in early-stage, whereas TP53 mutations were more common in advanced stage. Significant associations were observed between TP53 mutation and serous carcinoma, and between KRAS mutation and mucinous carcinoma. Both PIK3CA mutation and CTNNB1 mutation were also significantly associated with endometrioid and clear cell carcinoma. The patients with PIK3CA and KRAS mutations were significantly associated with favorable progression free survival (PFS). In particular, PIK3CA mutations had more significant associations with favorable PFS than PIK3CA wild-type in the endometrioid subtype (P = 0.012). Patients with mutations only in TP53 were significantly associated with worse PFS.

Conclusion: EOCs were heterogeneous at the genomic level and harbored somatic oncogenic mutations. Our molecular profiling may have the potential for becoming a novel stratification within histological subtypes of EOC. Further studies are needed to define molecular classification for improved clinical outcomes and treatment of EOC patients in future.

Keywords: Epithelial ovarian cancer; Molecular profiling; Prognostic biomarker; Somatic oncogenic mutations.

MeSH terms

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial / physiopathology*
Female
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing / methods*
Humans
Middle Aged
Mutation