Exposure, hazard, and vulnerability all contribute to Schistosoma haematobium re-infection in northern Senegal

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Oct 5;15(10):e0009806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009806. eCollection 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Infectious disease risk is driven by three interrelated components: exposure, hazard, and vulnerability. For schistosomiasis, exposure occurs through contact with water, which is often tied to daily activities. Water contact, however, does not imply risk unless the environmental hazard of snails and parasites is also present in the water. By increasing reliance on hazardous activities and environments, socio-economic vulnerability can hinder reductions in exposure to a hazard. We aimed to quantify the contributions of exposure, hazard, and vulnerability to the presence and intensity of Schistosoma haematobium re-infection.

Methodology/principal findings: In 13 villages along the Senegal River, we collected parasitological data from 821 school-aged children, survey data from 411 households where those children resided, and ecological data from all 24 village water access sites. We fit mixed-effects logistic and negative binomial regressions with indices of exposure, hazard, and vulnerability as explanatory variables of Schistosoma haematobium presence and intensity, respectively, controlling for demographic variables. Using multi-model inference to calculate the relative importance of each component of risk, we found that hazard (Ʃwi = 0.95) was the most important component of S. haematobium presence, followed by vulnerability (Ʃwi = 0.91). Exposure (Ʃwi = 1.00) was the most important component of S. haematobium intensity, followed by hazard (Ʃwi = 0.77). Model averaging quantified associations between each infection outcome and indices of exposure, hazard, and vulnerability, revealing a positive association between hazard and infection presence (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.12, 1.97), and a positive association between exposure and infection intensity (RR 2.59-3.86, depending on the category; all 95% CIs above 1).

Conclusions/significance: Our findings underscore the linkages between social (exposure and vulnerability) and environmental (hazard) processes in the acquisition and accumulation of S. haematobium infection. This approach highlights the importance of implementing both social and environmental interventions to complement mass drug administration.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Animals
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Reinfection / epidemiology
  • Reinfection / parasitology*
  • Reinfection / psychology
  • Rural Population / statistics & numerical data
  • Schistosoma haematobium / genetics
  • Schistosoma haematobium / isolation & purification
  • Schistosoma haematobium / physiology*
  • Schistosomiasis haematobia / epidemiology
  • Schistosomiasis haematobia / parasitology*
  • Schistosomiasis haematobia / psychology
  • Senegal / epidemiology
  • Social Vulnerability*
  • Vulnerable Populations / statistics & numerical data
  • Water / parasitology

Substances

  • Water

Associated data

  • Dryad/10.5061/dryad.s7h44j15p

Grants and funding

The study received funding from the National Science Foundation Couple Natural Human Systems program (BCS-1414102 to SHS and DLC) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1114050 to SHS and GADL). AJL was supported by a James and Nance Kelso Fellowship through the Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowship (SIGF) program at Stanford University. GADL, SHS and AJL were also partially supported by the National Science Foundation (DEB-2011179 to GADL and Belmont CEH/NSF ICER-2024383 to GADL). IJJ was funded by National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (#1656518). CLW was supported by the Michigan Society of Fellows at the University of Michigan, a Sloan Research Fellowship from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, a UW Innovation Award and a grant from the National Science Foundation (OCE-1829509 to CLW). SA was funded by the King Center on Global Development Field Research Assistant Program. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, interpretation or the decision to submit the work for publication.