Fluid Therapy and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Abstract

The optimal fluid management for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains unknown. Liberal fluid management may improve cardiac function and end-organ perfusion, but may lead to increased pulmonary edema and inhibit gas exchange. Trials suggest that conservative fluid management leads to better clinical outcomes, although prospective randomized, controlled trials have not demonstrated mortality benefit. Recent discoveries suggest there is large heterogeneity in ARDS, and varying phenotypes of ARDS respond differently to fluid treatments. Future advances in management will require real-time assignment of ARDS phenotypes, which may facilitate inclusion into clinical trials by ARDS phenotype and guide development of targeted therapies.

Keywords: Acute lung injury; Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Conservative fluid management; Deresuscitative fluid management; Hyperinflammatory and hypoinflammatory acute respiratory distress syndrome; Liberal fluid management; Phenotypes of acute respiratory distress syndrome.