Automatic electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis has been one of the very early use cases for computer assisted diagnosis (CAD). Most ECG devices provide some level of automatic ECG analysis. In the recent years, Deep Learning (DL) is increasingly used for this task, with the first models that claim to perform better than human physicians. In this manuscript, a pilot study is conducted to evaluate the added value of such a DL model to existing built-in analysis with respect to clinical relevance. 29 12-lead ECGs have been analyzed with a published DL model and results are compared to build-in analysis and clinical diagnosis. We could not reproduce the results of the test data exactly, presumably due to a different runtime environment. However, the errors were in the order of rounding errors and did not affect the final classification. The excellent performance in detection of left bundle branch block and atrial fibrillation that was reported in the publication could be reproduced. The DL method and the built-in method performed similarly good for the chosen cases regarding clinical relevance. While benefit of the DL method for research can be attested and usage in training can be envisioned, evaluation of added value in clinical practice would require a more comprehensive study with further and more complex cases.
Keywords: Atrial Fibrillation; Classification; Deep Learning; Deep Neural Network; ECG; Left Bundle Branch Block; Reproducibility of Results.