Evaluation of the performance of 25 SARS-CoV-2 serological rapid diagnostic tests using a reference panel of plasma specimens at the Uganda Virus Research Institute

Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Nov:112:281-287. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.020. Epub 2021 Sep 15.

Abstract

Introduction: Serological testing is needed to better understand the epidemiology of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been developed to detect specific antibodies, IgM and IgG, to the virus. The performance of 25 of these RDTs was evaluated.

Methods: A serological reference panel of 50 positive and 100 negative plasma specimens was developed from SARS-CoV-2 PCR and antibody positive patients and pre-pandemic SARS-CoV-2-negative specimens collected in 2016. Test performance of the 25 RDTs was evaluated against this panel.

Results: A total of 10 RDTs had a sensitivity ≥98%, while 13 RDTs had a specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Four RDTs (Boson, MultiG, Standard Q, and VivaDiag) had both sensitivity and specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Only three RDTs had a sensitivity ≥98%, while 10 RDTs had a specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibodies. Three RDTs (Autobio, MultiG, and Standard Q) had sensitivity and specificity ≥98% to combined IgG/IgM. The RDTs that performed well also had perfect or almost perfect inter-reader agreement.

Conclusions: This evaluation identified three RDTs with a sensitivity and specificity to IgM/IgG antibodies of ≥98% with the potential for widespread antibody testing in Uganda.

Keywords: COVID-19; Rapid diagnostic test; SARS-CoV-2; antibody; performance; serological reference panel.

MeSH terms

  • Academies and Institutes
  • Antibodies, Viral
  • COVID-19*
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulin M
  • SARS-CoV-2*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Uganda / epidemiology

Substances

  • Antibodies, Viral
  • Immunoglobulin M