Background: We sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized clinical trials to assess the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in cervical epithelial neoplasia (CIN) and early-stage cervical cancer. Additionally, according to the results, we tried to consider which stage of CIN is more sensitive to PDT.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted using electronic databases including PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar.
Inclusion criteria: all patients had confirmed low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), or an early-stage cervical cancer - the cancer is less than 3 mm deep into the cervix -IA; type of photosensitizer and any type of wavelength.
Exclusion criteria: women who were previously treated with PDT; Risk of bias assessment was carried out for each study included in the systematic review using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: RoB-2 was used to assess the risk of bias in randomized studies, while ROBINS-I - in non-randomized ones.
Results: We identified 2213 publications, but only 6 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the synthesis. PDT is most effective when patients have CIN 2 or photosensitizer is administered intravenously.
Conclusion: Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, it could be concluded that photodynamic therapy may be a practical approach in CIN (LSIL) regression compared with placebo. Nevertheless, we need more evidence and long-term follow-up to answer all questions thoroughly.
Keywords: CIN; Cervical cancer; Cervical neoplasia; HSIL; LSIL; PDT; Photodynamic Therapy.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.