How to design, implement and evaluate organizational interventions for maximum impact: the Sigtuna Principles

Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2020 Aug 26;30(3):415-427. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2020.1803960. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Research on organizational interventions needs to meet the objectives of both researchers and participating organizations. This duality means that real-world impact has to be considered throughout the research process, simultaneously addressing both scientific rigour and practical relevance. This discussion paper aims to offer a set of principles, grounded in knowledge from various disciplines that can guide researchers in designing, implementing, and evaluating organizational interventions. Inspired by Mode 2 knowledge production, the principles were developed through a transdisciplinary, participatory and iterative process where practitioners and academics were invited to develop, refine and validate the principles. The process resulted in 10 principles: 1) Ensure active engagement and participation among key stakeholders; 2) Understand the situation (starting points and objectives); 3) Align the intervention with existing organizational objectives; 4) Explicate the program logic; 5) Prioritize intervention activities based on effort-gain balance; 6) Work with existing practices, processes, and mindsets; 7) Iteratively observe, reflect, and adapt; 8) Develop organizational learning capabilities; 9) Evaluate the interaction between intervention, process, and context; and 10) Transfer knowledge beyond the specific organization. The principles suggest how the design, implementation, and evaluation of organizational interventions can be researched in a way that maximizes both practical and scientific impact.

Keywords: Academy-practice partnership; occupational health interventions; participation; recommendations; workplace-based interventions.

Grants and funding

This work was supported by grants from the following agencies and grants. Funding for the meetings and the writing of this paper was generously provided by a network grant from the Joint Committee for Nordic research councils in the Humanities and Social Sciences (grant number 2016-00241/NOS-HS). In addition, UvTS was funded by the Swedish Research Council (2016-01261). JR was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) programme for North West London, and The Health Foundation. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funders.