Development of a Remote Examination of Deglutition Based on Consensus Surveys of Clinicians (Part I): Selection of Examination Items

Abstract

In order to ensure appropriateness and feasibility of examination items for remote evaluation for deglutition disorders, a questionnaire based on the Delphi method was administered to 122 speech-language-hearing therapists (STs), and a set of examination items was selected. The participants were instructed to view a video recording of a remote assessment situation and answer a 30-item questionnaire. Of 19 items ensuring the appropriateness for deglutition disorders detection, 13 items ultimately met the consensus criteria for remote feasibility. Factor analysis extracted three factors: 'oral observation,' 'overall evaluation,' and 'perceptual voice judgment.' In free-text responses, "quality and stability of the voice that may be heard through the device" were the most common concerns, followed by "the need to correct of the camera angle, magnification, and targets that should be projected," "concerns about the technical aspects of the assistants and their role in relation with the examiner/ST," and "the need for palpation as well as visual confirmation." The proposed 13-item examination is considered to capture the characteristics of deglutition disorders, while items that appeared difficult to implement remotely were excluded. The fact that some items could be influenced by the video calling experience when judging the feasibility of remote implementation, the acceptability of such items, is likely to increase in the future.

Keywords: Deglutition; Deglutition disorders; Delphi survey; Remote evaluation; Speech–language–hearing therapist.