Comparison of different pretreatment methods on phosphorus release and recovery as struvite from excess sludge

Environ Technol. 2023 Jan;44(2):161-169. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2021.1967459. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

Abstract

Recovering phosphorus (P) from excess sludge of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) has attracted considerable attention. An efficient P release method is undoubtedly critical for a satisfactory recovery performance. In this study, the effectiveness of three sludge pretreatment methods, i.e. anaerobic digestion (AD), EDTA-anaerobic digestion (EA) and ultrasound combined with EA (U-EA), on P release and struvite recovery from excess sludge was investigated. The results showed that different pretreatment methods resulted in the different characteristics of P release and recovery. For P release, the highest P release rate (57.14% of sludge total phosphorus, TP) was achieved by U-EA pretreatment, followed by EA and AD. Furthermore, U-EA was beneficial for sludge disintegration and reduction, by which the mixed liquor suspended solids (MLVSS) reduction rate reached 42.00% at a specific energy of 110,000 kJ/kg TS. For the P recovery (in the form of struvite), there was only a little difference in the optimal conditions and P recovery rate (89.29-94.49% of TP in the supernatant). AD pretreatment was beneficial for the purity of products and achieved the highest struvite purity (85.14%), followed by EA (80.95%) and U-EA (77.56%). In summary, the highest recovery rate of TP from excess sludge (53.50% of sludge TP) and struvite yield (26.10 mg/gSS) was obtained by U-EA.

Keywords: Excess sludge; phosphorus release; response surface methodology; struvite; ultrasound.

MeSH terms

  • Phosphates
  • Phosphorus*
  • Sewage*
  • Struvite
  • Waste Disposal, Fluid / methods

Substances

  • Struvite
  • Phosphorus
  • Sewage
  • Phosphates