Patient-Specific Biomechanics in Marfan Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms

Abstract

Background: Guidelines for sinus of Valsalva (SOV)-thoracic aortic aneurysms in Marfan syndrome recommend size-based criteria for elective surgical repair. Biomechanics may provide a better prediction of dissection risk than diameter. Our aim was to determine magnitudes of wall stress in the aortic root of Marfan patients using finite element analyses.

Methods: Forty-six Marfan patients underwent patient-specific 3-dimensional SOV-thoracic aortic aneurysm geometry reconstruction using imaging data. Finite element analyses were performed to determine wall stress distributions at SOV, sinotubular junction (STJ), and ascending aorta (AscAo) at systole.

Results: Peak circumferential stresses were 432.8 ± 111 kPa, 408.1 ± 88.3 kPa, and 321.9 ± 83.8 kPa at the SOV, STJ, and AscAo, respectively, with significant differences between SOV and AscAo (P < 3.08E-07), and STJ and AscAo (P < 2.26E-06). Peak longitudinal wall stresses were 352 ± 73.9 kPa, 277.5 ± 89.5 kPa, and 200.6 ± 81 kPa at SOV, STJ, and AscAo, respectively, with significant differences between SOV and STJ (P < 6.01E-06), SOV and AscAo (P < 9.79E-13), and STJ and AscAo (P < 3.34E-07). Diameter was not correlated to wall stresses. Comparison of wall stresses in aneurysm <5 cm vs ≥5 cm and <4.5 cm vs ≥4.5 cm showed no significant differences in wall stresses in the circumferential or longitudinal direction.

Conclusions: Peak wall stresses in Marfan SOV- thoracic aortic aneurysm were greatest in SOV than STJ than AscAo. Diameter was poorly correlated to peak stresses such that current guidelines with 5 cm cutoff had significant overlap in peak stresses in patients with <5 cm vs ≥5 cm. Use of patient-specific Marfan aneurysm models may identify patients with high wall stresses and small aneurysms who could benefit from earlier surgical repair to prevent aortic dissection.