Self-Reported Dietary Supplement Use Is Reproducible and Relatively Valid in the Cancer Prevention Study-3 Diet Assessment Substudy

J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Sep;122(9):1665-1676.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Aug 13.

Abstract

Background: Dietary supplement use is common, particularly among cancer survivors and those at increased risk for cancer.

Objective: The objectives of this study were to assess 1-year test-retest reproducibility of dietary supplement use reported via food frequency questionnaire (FFQ-1 vs FFQ-2) and relative validity in comparison to repeated 24-hour dietary recalls (FFQ-2 vs DRs).

Design: This ancillary study was conducted within a large prospective cohort, the American Cancer Society's Cancer Prevention Study-3.

Participants/setting: Between 2015 and 2016, 684 participants in the United States (64% women; 62% non-Hispanic White, 23% non-Hispanic Black, and 15% Hispanic) completed two FFQs and up to six unannounced telephone interviewer-administered DRs over 1 year as part of the Cancer Prevention Study-3 Diet Assessment Substudy.

Primary outcome measures: FFQs queried current multivitamin-mineral supplement (≥10 components) use, frequency and dose (range) for seven supplements taken individually or as part of a complex (individual/complex) including calcium, vitamins D, C, and E, folic acid, fish oil, and glucosamine. DRs allowed exact reporting of supplement frequency and dose.

Statistical analyses: Weighted κ statistics were used to evaluate reproducibility between FFQ-1 and FFQ-2 and Spearman correlation coefficients assessed agreement between supplemental nutrient amounts assessed by FFQ-2 and the average of DRs.

Results: Just more than half of the participants reported taking multivitamin-mineral supplements on the baseline FFQ. Kappa statistics for the comparison of categorical responses between FFQ-1 and FFQ-2 were 0.67 for multivitamin-mineral supplements. Kappas for individual/complex supplements ranged from 0.47 for folic acid to 0.74 for vitamin D, with a mean of 0.64. Results were similar between men and women. Spearman correlation coefficients comparing FFQ-2 with the average of DRs (validity) for nutrient intakes from all sources ranged from 0.65 (fish oil for women) to 0.77 (vitamin D for men and calcium for women); results were similar among men and women.

Conclusions: These findings suggest the FFQ used in Cancer Prevention Study-3 has good reproducibility over 1 year and yields estimates comparable to a more detailed assessment for commonly consumed dietary supplements.

Keywords: Dietary supplements; Food frequency questionnaire; Reproducibility; Validity.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Calcium*
  • Diet
  • Diet Records
  • Diet Surveys
  • Dietary Supplements
  • Female
  • Fish Oils
  • Folic Acid
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Neoplasms* / prevention & control
  • Prospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Self Report
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Vitamin D

Substances

  • Fish Oils
  • Vitamin D
  • Folic Acid
  • Calcium