Aims: To date, no clinical studies have compared once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors with once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors in terms of glucose variability (GV) and oxidative stress (OS).
Methods: Thirty-six patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors for at least 12 weeks were randomized to either continue once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors or receive omarigliptin, a once-weekly DPP-4 inhibitor, for 24 weeks. The primary end points were changes in the diacron-reactive oxygen metabolite (d-ROMs) test, a marker of OS, and GV using flash glucose monitoring. The secondary end point was changes in the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ) scores.
Results: There were no significant group differences in d-ROMs and DTSQ scores after 24 weeks of treatments. However, omarigliptin was superior to once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors in controlling fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and time in range (TIR). Although FPG and TIR were unchanged at 24 weeks after switching to omarigliptin, these parameters increased in the group receiving maintenance therapy with once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors. No statistically significant changes in hemoglobin A1c were observed between the two groups.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that switching from once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors to omarigliptin may be efficacious for maintaining FPG and TIR in T2DM patients.
Keywords: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor; Flash glucose monitoring; Glucose variability; Oxidative stress; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.