Examining the day-level impact of physical activity on affect during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic: An ecological momentary assessment study

Bridgette Do; Shirlene D Wang; Jimikaye B Courtney; Genevieve F Dunton

doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102010

Examining the day-level impact of physical activity on affect during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic: An ecological momentary assessment study

Psychol Sport Exerc. 2021 Sep:56:102010. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102010. Epub 2021 Jun 28.

Authors

Bridgette Do¹, Shirlene D Wang¹, Jimikaye B Courtney², Genevieve F Dunton^{1

3}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA.
² Department Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
³ Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.

Abstract

Engaging in physical activity (PA) may be a promising approach to mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions on daily affect. The study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine the within-subject associations of day-level PA with same-day evening affect. Interactions between daily PA and overall stress related to COVID-19 predicting evening affect were also examined. Adults living in the U.S. (N = 157, M _age = 31.7, 84.1% female) participated in a 28-day smartphone-based EMA study during the early months of the pandemic (April - June 2020). Evening EMA surveys assessed daily PA minutes, momentary positive activated and deactivated affect, and momentary negative activated and deactivated affect. An online questionnaire assessed demographics. Multi-level linear regression models assessed day-level associations between PA and evening affect, controlling for age, sex, income, body mass index, employment status, and morning affect. There were N = 2,409 person-days in the analysis. Baseline COVID-19 stress was not associated with daily PA minutes (p = .09) or positive-activated affect (p = .14), but was associated with lower positive-deactivated affect (p < .001) and greater negative-activated and negative-deactivated affect (ps < .001) in the evenings. On days when individuals reported more PA than usual, they reported greater positive-activated and positive-deactivated affect, and lower negative-activated and negative-deactivated affect in the evening (ps < .001). The interaction of day-level PA and COVID-19 stress predicting evening positive-activated, positive-deactivated, negative-activated, and negative-deactivated affect was not significant (ps > .05). During the early months of the pandemic, adults experienced improved evening affect on days when they engaged in more PA. However, data did not show that PA counteracts detrimental effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on evening affect. Public health efforts should strategically promote and address barriers to PA during the pandemic.

Keywords: COVID-19; Ecological momentary assessment; affect; physical activity; stress.

Abstract

Grants and funding