Evaluating and comparing the green wall retrofit suitability across major Australian cities

Ashley N J Douglas; Angela L Morgan; Erin I E Rogers; Peter J Irga; Fraser R Torpy

doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113417

Evaluating and comparing the green wall retrofit suitability across major Australian cities

J Environ Manage. 2021 Nov 15:298:113417. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113417. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

Authors

Ashley N J Douglas¹, Angela L Morgan², Erin I E Rogers², Peter J Irga³, Fraser R Torpy²

Affiliations

¹ Plants and Environmental Quality Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: Ashley.Douglas@uts.edu.au.
² Plants and Environmental Quality Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.
³ School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.

PMID: 34364245
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113417

Abstract

Urban densification continues to present a unique set of economic and environmental challenges. A growing shortage of green space and infrastructure is intrinsically linked with urban growth and development. With this comes the loss of ecosystem services such as urban heat island effects, reduction of air quality and biodiversity loss. Vertical greenery systems (VGS) offer an adaptive solution to space-constrained areas that are characteristic of dense urban areas, and can potentially improve the sustainability of cities. However, in order to promote VGS uptake, methods are required to enable systematic appraisal of whether existing walls can be retrofitted with VGS. Further, feasibility studies that quantify the potential for retrofit suitability of VGS across entire urban areas are lacking. This study established an evaluation tool for green wall constructability in urban areas and validated the assessment tool by determining the quantity of walls in five major Australian cities that could potentially have VGS incorporated into the existing infrastructure. Each wall was analysed using an exclusionary set of criteria that evaluated and ranked a wall based on its suitability to VGS implementation. Sydney and Brisbane recorded the greatest proportional length of walls suitable for VGS, with 33.74% and 34.12% respectively. Conversely, Perth's urban centre was the least feasible site in which to incorporate VGS, with over 97% of surveyed walls excluded, mainly due to the prevalence of <1 m high fence lines and glazed shopfronts. This study aimed to evaluate feasibility assessments of green wall retrofitability in highly urbanised areas with the intention of creating an analytical method that is accessible to all. This method, coupled with the promising number of feasible walls found in this study, emphasises the need for more government policy and incentives encouraging green wall uptake and could play a pivotal role in the expansion of green infrastructure and urban forestry.

Keywords: Green infrastructure; Green walls; Greenwall retrofit; Sustainability; Urban forestry; Vertical greenery system.

MeSH terms

Australia
Biodiversity
Cities
Ecosystem*
Hot Temperature*