Difference in Prognosis between Continuation and Discontinuation of A 5-Month Cardiac Rehabilitation Program in Outpatients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 27;10(15):3306. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153306.

Abstract

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a requisite component of care for patients with heart failure (HF). We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes in outpatients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared to those in patients with non-HFpEF who did and did not continue a 5-month CR program.

Methods: 173 outpatients with HF who participated in a 5-month CR program were registered. We divided them into two groups: HFpEF (n = 84, EF 63 ± 7%) and non-HFpEF (n = 89, EF 31 ± 11%). We further divided the patients into those who continued the CR program (continued group) and those who did not (discontinued group) in the HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups. The clinical outcomes at 5 months were compared among the groups.

Results: There were no significant differences in patient characteristics at baseline between the continued and discontinued groups in the HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups except for % diabetes mellitus in the non-HFpEF group. The rates of all-cause death and hospital admissions in the continued group in both the HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups were significantly lower than those in the discontinued group. The all-cause death and hospital admissions in each group were independently associated with the continuation of the CR program.

Conclusions: The continuation of a 5-month CR program was associated with the prevention of all-cause death and hospital admissions in both the HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups.

Keywords: cardiac rehabilitation program; continued group; discontinued group; preserved ejection fraction.