Teaching of the repair of defective composite restorations in Middle Eastern and North African Dental Schools

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the status of teaching of repair of defective resin-based composite restorations in dental schools in the Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) countries.

Methods: A validated 14-item questionnaire was mailed to the directors of the operative/restorative dentistry department in 40 MENA dental schools. Data were collected on teaching, including whether the repair of resin-based composite restorations was part of the dental school curriculum; the rationale behind the teaching; how techniques were taught, indications for repair, operative techniques, materials used, patient acceptability and expected longevity of the repair procedure.

Results: Thirty-two schools responded to the survey (response rate of 80%). Twenty-two (69%) schools reported the teaching of resin-based composite repairs as an alternative to the replacement of restorations. Of the schools not teaching repairs, 80% indicated that they plan to include this topic in the curriculum within the next five years. Most schools taught theoretical and practical aspects of repair at a clinical level only. Two-thirds of schools reported tooth substance preservation being the main reason for teaching repair techniques. The main indications for repair treatment were marginal defects (59%), followed by partial loss of restoration (56%). Most schools that performed repairs reported high patient acceptability. Considerable variation was noted in relation to expected longevity of resin- based composite repairs.

Conclusions: The repair of defective resin-based composite restorations is actively taught within most of the surveyed schools. Advantages of repair, compared to replacement include minimum intervention, preservation of tooth structure, and savings of time and cost.

Clinical significance: The decision between replacing or repairing a defective resin-based composite restoration in the MENA region tends to be based on clinicians' subjective experience and judgement. However, to further enhance the teaching of resin-based composite repair standardised guidelines need to be developed based on existing evidence.

Keywords: Defective resin-based composite restorations; Repair; Teaching.