Relationship between reinforcement rate and response rate in Pavlovian and operant conditioning with compound stimuli in rats

Abstract

Harris, Andrew, and Livesey (2012) proposed that response rate (R) to a stimulus (e.g., A) of a compound (e.g., AB) would be directly related to the difference between reinforcement rate (r) during AB and the other stimulus (e.g., B). To explore the extent of this proposal to operant conditioning, three experiments were carried out. Experiment 1 replicated Harris et al. (2012 - Experiment 1) using sucrose as US in Pavlovian conditioning. In Experiment 2 rats pressed a lever under a variable interval schedule in two phases. In Training, responses during a compound stimulus AB100% were reinforced 100%, responses during B50% and C50% 50% and responses during D25%, 25% of the trials. Then, nonreinforced A trials were introduced (Probe). Results from Experiment 2 showed that r controlled the R to AB100%, B50%, C50% and D25% during training and probe, however, were inconclusive about r and R relationship during A. In Experiment 3, responses during A100% were reinforced 100% and during B50% and C50% 50% of the trials (Training). Next, nonreinforced BC trials were presented (Probe). Results from Experiment 3 showed that response rate during BC were similar to A100%, but higher than B50% and C50%, suggesting summation of B50% and C50% reinforcement rates. Overall, the results showed that Harris et al. (2012) proposal extends to discriminative operant relations.

Keywords: Compound stimuli; Operant conditioning; Pavlovian conditioning; Rats; Reinforcement rate.