Willingness to pay for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Anahita Shokri Jamnani; Aziz Rezapour; Najmeh Moradi; Mostafa Langarizadeh

doi:10.47176/mjiri.35.81

Willingness to pay for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Jun 23:35:81. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.81. eCollection 2021.

Authors

Anahita Shokri Jamnani¹, Aziz Rezapour², Najmeh Moradi³, Mostafa Langarizadeh⁴

Affiliations

¹ Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
² Health Management and Economics Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
³ Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
⁴ Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Background: The Willingness to pay (WTP) for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention (CCP) methods have an important role in the control of this type of cancer. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the WTP and acceptance of CCP methods with the contingent valuation method (CVM). Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, the required information was collected by searching relevant keywords in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and their Persian equivalent in the Scientific Information Database (SID) and Elmnet databases during January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2020. All studies that reported the WTP and CCP methods with the CVM in English or Persian were included. The reporting quality of studies was assessed by strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). Comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA: 2) software was used to conduct the meta-analysis. The content analysis method was used for qualitative data analysis. Results: Finally, 28 articles (with 49610 people) were included in the study. Most of the participants were women (35.7%). The HPV vaccine was the most common method of prevention (75%). The overall acceptance rate was 64% and the overall positive WTP rate was 66%. The average WTP was US$30.44, which accounts for about 0.84% of GDP per capita. The most significant effective factors included income, age, education, high-risk sexual behaviors, and awareness of cervical cancer, belief in the risk of cervical cancer, and belief about the effectiveness of prevention methods. The cost was the most important reason for the unwillingness to pay and accept. Conclusion: Results show that the WTP and acceptance rate of CCP methods are relatively high. It is recommended to reduce the cost of prevention methods, especially the HPV vaccine, and to increase awareness and improve the attitude of people. Also, it is recommended to consider other methods of estimation of WTP and other cancers in future studies.

Keywords: Acceptance; Cervical Cancer; Human Papillomavirus Vaccine; Preventive Measures.

Publication types

Review