Association between monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio and tuberculin skin test positivity in HIV-positive adults

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 16;16(7):e0253907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253907. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Background: The tuberculin skin test (TST) identifies individuals at high risk of developing tuberculosis (TB) but poses many challenges. The blood monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) could be an alternative, as extremes in MLR have been associated with increased risk of TB disease.

Methods: At a primary care clinic in Johannesburg, a differential white blood cell count and TST was performed in adults starting antiretroviral treatment (ART) without symptoms suggestive of active TB.

Results: Of 259 participants, 171 had valid results of whom 30% (51/171) were TST positive and the median MLR was 0.18 (IQR 0.13-0.28). The MLR distribution differed between CD4 count categories (p < 0.01), with a broader range of values in TST negative participants with a low CD4 count (≤ 250 cells/mm3), likely reflecting HIV immunosuppression. MLR was associated with a positive TST (OR 0.78 per 0.1 increase, 95% CI 0.59, 0.97) in bivariate analysis but not in multivariate regression analysis (aOR 0.83 for every 0.1 increase, 95% CI 0.60, 1.08).

Conclusion: In ART-naïve adults without symptoms suggestive of active TB, MLR was not independently associated with TST positivity and is thus unlikely to be a useful alternative to TST. Future research should focus on development of a cheap, simple and accurate biomarker to identify those people benefiting most from preventive TB therapy.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anti-Retroviral Agents / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Monocytes
  • South Africa
  • Tuberculin Test*
  • Tuberculosis

Substances

  • Anti-Retroviral Agents

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID, https://www.usaid.gov) under award number AID-674-A-12-00033 [EV, JB, CH, AVR], with additional funding from Vlaamse Interuniversitaire Raad (VLIR, https://www.vliruos.be) under award number NDOC2016PR001 [EV]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of USAID or VLIR. The funders provided salary support [EV, JB, CH, AVR], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of the authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.