Recent successful trials of thrombectomy launched a shift to imaging-based patient selection for stroke intervention. Many centers have adopted CT perfusion imaging (CTP) as a routine part of stroke workflow, and the demand for emergent CTP interpretation is growing. Fully automated CTP postprocessing software that rapidly generates standardized color-coded CTP summary maps with minimal user input and with easy accessibility of the software output is increasingly being adopted. Such automated postprocessing greatly streamlines clinical workflow and CTP interpretation for radiologists and other frontline physicians. However, the straightforward interface overshadows the computational complexity of the underlying postprocessing workflow, which, if not carefully examined, predisposes the interpreting physician to diagnostic errors. Using case examples, this article aims to familiarize the general radiologist with interpreting automated CTP software data output in the context of contemporary stroke management, providing a discussion of CTP acquisition and postprocessing, a stepwise guide for CTP quality assurance and troubleshooting, and a framework for avoiding clinically significant pitfalls of CTP interpretation in commonly encountered clinical scenarios. Interpreting radiologists should apply the outlined approach for quality assurance and develop a comprehensive search pattern for the identified pitfalls, to ensure accurate CTP interpretation and optimize patient selection for reperfusion.
Keywords: CT perfusion imaging; automated software; ischemic stroke; pitfalls; postprocessing; quality assurance.