Purpose: This study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of local anesthesia (LA) for percutaneous ultrasound/computed tomography (US/CT)-guided bipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small renal masses (SRMs) by comparing the LA with general anesthesia.
Materials and methods: A retrospective review was carried out between January 2018 to June 2020, 102 patients with SRMs were treated with US/CT-guided bipolar RFA. General anesthesia (GA) was performed in 42 and LA was performed in 60 patients. Demographics, tumor characteristics, peri-procedural data, pathologic and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. The factors associated with pain were also identified.
Results: There was no significant difference in demographics and tumor characteristics between the LA and GA group. A statistically significant difference was observed in terms of procedural time (P = 0.010) and hospital stays (P < 0.001). The maximum perceived pain in LA group comprised 60.0% (36 of 60) mild, 40.0% (24 of 60) moderate. The anxiety in LA group comprised 65.0% (39 of 60) mild, 33.3% (20 of 60) moderate, 1.7% (1 of 60) severe. On multivariate analysis, tumor diameter was a significant predictor for pain in RFA procedure (OR 1.560, 95% CI 1.233-1.974, P < 0.001). All patients were followed up for a median (range) of 12 (2-24) months. Local recurrence occurred in 8.3% (5 of 60) of the LA group and in 7.1% (3 of 42) in GA group (P = 1.000).
Conclusion: Percutaneous bipolar RFA of SRMs using CT and ultrasound guidance under LA can be an effective and tolerable method for patients who are unfit for surgery and provide satisfactory oncologic control.
Keywords: Computed tomography; Local anesthesia; Radiofrequency ablation; Small renal mass; Ultrasound.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.