The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial

Patrick L Taggart; Stephen Morris; Charles G B Caraguel

doi:10.7717/peerj.11531

The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial

PeerJ. 2021 Jun 30:9:e11531. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11531. eCollection 2021.

Authors

Patrick L Taggart^{1

2}, Stephen Morris³, Charles G B Caraguel¹

Affiliations

¹ School of Animal and Veterinary Science, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, Australia.
² Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Queanbeyan, NSW, Australia.
³ NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wollonbar, NSW, Australia.

Abstract

Individual identification is fundamental to the study of captive and wild animals but can have adverse impacts if the method of identification is inappropriate for the species or question of interest. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to test whether passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags reduced the growth or survival of pythons. We randomly allocated 200 captive-bred Burmese python (Python bivittatus) hatchlings into two groups, tagged versus untagged. Hatchlings were individually identified using a combination of PIT tags and unique colour patterns, and their mass, snout-vent length (SVL) and body condition measured at 9, 73, 134, 220, 292 and 385 days of age. We recorded the date of all mortalities. Python morphometrics and their rate of change increased or fluctuated non-linearly with age. The impact of PIT tagging on python body mass and body mass growth over the 376 day study period was insignificant. PIT tagging additionally had an insignificant impact on python survival. However, we found minor differences in SVL growth between tagged and untagged pythons. These differences peaked at approximately 0.5 mm/day and appeared to drive similar, but more pronounced, differences between tagged and untagged pythons in their rate of change in body condition; peaking at approximately 3-4 g/day. While we cannot be certain that these small differences are, or are not, biologically meaningful, they nonetheless appear to be short-term and readily resolved. Unsurprisingly, the strongest driver of python growth was their age, with growth rapidly increasing or highest amongst younger snakes for all measures of size. Python sex was associated with their body mass and survival, with higher mass but lower survival amongst females. Python size at hatching did not impact on their growth or survival. Our results confirm that PIT tags are a valuable and effective tool for the identification and tracking of captive pythons, and snakes generally, and meet high safety and animal welfare standards.

Keywords: Ecology; Growth; Herpetology; PIT; Passive integrated transponder; Python; Randomised controlled trial; Snake; Survival; Traceability.

Grants and funding

Charles G.B. Caraguel’s time in setting up the study was funded by Verdeveleno. The authors received no other funding for this work. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.