The results of health-related quality of life assessment depend on the prevailing rhythm at the assessment: Experience from the CAPTAF trial (Catheter Ablation Compared with Pharmacological Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation)

Abstract

Aims: To assess whether the prevailing rhythm at the time of replying to symptom and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) questionnaires impacts the findings.

Method: A total of 150 patients from the randomized Catheter Ablation Compared with Pharmacological Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation-trial, comparing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation versus drugs, were included. The effect of the prevailing rhythm on the outcome results of the HR-QoL 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, the symptom severity questionnaire (SSQ), and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) score for classification of AF-related symptoms was assessed.

Results: AF as the prevailing rhythm was independently associated with a significantly lower Vitality score; 18.4 points lower (95% confidence interval -32.7 to -4.1, p = .01) compared with sinus rhythm when adjusted for AF burden, median duration of episode, number of episodes, beta-blocker use, type of AF, and sex. The presence of AF did not affect the General Health score compared with sinus rhythm, nor did it influence symptoms assessed by the SSQ or EHRA score.

Conclusion: The observation that the presence of AF versus sinus rhythm when conducting HR-QoL tests had a negative impact on its outcome, leaving symptom-related questionnaires unaffected, implies that the prevailing rhythm should be taken into account when results of HR-QoL questionnaires are interpreted.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; health-related quality of life; implantable loop recorders; rhythm.