Background: In clinical practice, drains had been routinely used for reducing seroma formation after breast surgery. However, an optimal timing to remove drains does not identify yet.
Methods: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcome, such as seroma formation, surgical site infection (SSI), and a length of hospital stay between early removal and late removal. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library. Breast cancer patients who received surgery using drains were eligible. Those parameters were compared between early vs late removal.
Results: Eleven studies included in this meta-analysis. Seroma formation in the early removal group was significantly higher than the one in the late removal group (RR = 1.58: 95%CI [1.25-2.01], P = 0.0001), meanwhile no significant difference was found among the groups for SSI (RR = 0.82: 95%CI [0.51-1.31], P= 0.40). A length of hospital stay in the early removal group was also significantly shorter than late removal (RR -3.31: 95%CI [-5.13-1.49], P = 0.0004).
Conclusions: Seroma formation was significantly higher in patients who had early drain removal. Conversely, SSI incidence was low, and early removal did not increase SSI incidence. In conclusion, early drain removal has no proved clinical benefit in these settings besides reduction of hospital stays.
Keywords: Breast cancer surgery; Hospital stay seroma; Surgical site infection; Wound drainage.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.