Use of M-M-R II outside of the routinely recommended age range - a systematic literature review

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):1-7. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1933874. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

Abstract

M-M-R®II (M-M-R II) is routinely used in many countries at 12-15 months with a second dose at 4 to 6 years of age. However, the vaccine may need to be administered at other ages due to delays in the immunization schedule or in certain situations such as outbreaks or international travel. A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of M-M-R II among 6- to 11-month-olds and persons ≥7 years of age. A search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in 2019 including Medline, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL. Only one study reported seroconversion rates after one dose in infants at 9 months of age: 87.4% (measles), 92.3% (mumps), and 91.2% (rubella); no safety data were reported. Seven studies reported immunogenicity and safety data for M-M-R II at ≥7 years of age. Seroconversion rates ranged from 96%-100% (measles), 65%-100% (mumps), and 91%-100% (rubella). Rates of selected adverse events ranged from 5.2%-8.7% for fever (≥38°C or ≥38.1°C), 2%-33.3% for injection site reactions, and 0.4% for measles/rubella-like rash (one study). No efficacy studies were found. This literature review identified RCTs with evidence to support that M-M-R II is immunogenic and well tolerated in individuals ≥7 years of age.

Keywords: MMR vaccine; age; efficacy; immunogenicity; infants; measles; mumps; rubella; safety.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antibodies, Viral
  • Antigens, Viral
  • Humans
  • Immunization Schedule
  • Infant
  • Measles* / prevention & control
  • Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine
  • Mumps* / prevention & control
  • Rubella* / prevention & control
  • Vaccines, Combined

Substances

  • Antibodies, Viral
  • Antigens, Viral
  • Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine
  • Vaccines, Combined

Grants and funding

This work was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA