A quantitative risk assessment to evaluate the efficacy of mitigation strategies to reduce highly pathogenic avian influenza virus, subtype H5N1 (HPAI H5N1) in the Menoufia governorate, Egypt

BMC Vet Res. 2021 Jun 7;17(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02917-7.

Abstract

Background: The poultry industry in Egypt has been suffering from endemic highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus, subtype H5N1 since 2006. However, the emergence of H9N2, H5N8, and H5N2 in 2011, 2016, and 2019 respectively, has aggravated the situation. Our objective was to evaluate how effective are the mitigation strategies by a Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) model which used daily outbreak data of HPAI-H5N1 subtype in Egypt, stratified by different successive epidemic waves from 2006 to 2016.

Results: By applying the epidemiologic problem-oriented approach methodology, a conceptual scenario tree was drawn based on the knowledgebase. Monte Carlo simulations of QRA parameters based on outbreak data were performed using @Risk software based on a scenario-driven decision tree. In poultry farms, the expected probability of HPAI H5N1 prevalence is 48% due to failure of mitigation strategies in 90% of the time during Monte Carlo simulations. Failure of efficacy of these mitigations will raise prevalence to 70% with missed vaccination, while failure in detection by surveillance activities will raise it to 99%. In backyard poultry farms, the likelihood of still having a high HPAI-H5N1 prevalence in different poultry types due to failure of passive and active surveillance varies between domestic, mixed and reservoir. In mixed poultry, the probability of HPAI-H5N1 not detected by surveillance was the highest with a mean and a SD of 16.8 × 10-3 and 3.26 × 10-01 respectively. The sensitivity analysis ranking for the likelihood of HPAI-H5N1 in poultry farms due to missed vaccination, failure to be detected by passive and active surveillance was examined. Among poultry farms, increasing vaccination by 1 SD will decrease the prevalence by 14%, while active and passive surveillance decreases prevalence by 12, and 6%, respectively. In backyard, the active surveillance had high impact in decreasing the prevalence by 16% in domestic chicken. Whereas the passive surveillance had less impact in decreasing prevalence by 14% in mixed poultry and 3% in domestic chicken.

Conclusion: It could be concluded that the applied strategies were not effective in controlling the spread of the HPAI-H5N1 virus. Public health officials should take into consideration the evaluation of their control strategies in their response.

Keywords: Egypt; HPAI-H5N1; Menoufia governorate; Monte Carlo simulations; Prevalence; Quantitative risk assessment; Sensitivity analysis.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Chickens* / virology
  • Disease Outbreaks / prevention & control
  • Disease Outbreaks / veterinary
  • Egypt / epidemiology
  • Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype*
  • Influenza Vaccines / administration & dosage*
  • Influenza in Birds / epidemiology
  • Influenza in Birds / prevention & control*
  • Influenza in Birds / virology
  • Models, Biological
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Poultry Diseases / epidemiology
  • Poultry Diseases / prevention & control*
  • Poultry Diseases / virology
  • Prevalence
  • Risk Assessment

Substances

  • Influenza Vaccines