Background: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for the treatment of marine-associated wound infections include empiric coverage for Vibrio species with a combination of a third-generation cephalosporin and doxycycline. These recommendations are based on limited data and it remains unclear if this regimen is also indicated for prophylaxis.
Objective: The purpose of this analysis was to assess the antibiotic regimens used in the emergency department (ED) for prophylaxis of marine-associated injuries relative to the CDC recommendations and evaluate any clinical impact.
Methods: A retrospective review evaluated adult patients discharged from the ED over a 4-year period with an antibiotic prescription following an injury with marine exposure.
Results: 114 patients were included in the analysis. The majority of patients were < 40 years of age with no previous medical history and presented after sustaining a laceration secondary to oyster shells. 97.4% received prophylactic antibiotic therapy that did not match the CDC recommendations, with the majority receiving doxycycline monotherapy (82%). A 1.8% 30-day ED revisit rate was noted with 2 patients returning for therapy failure. No patients were admitted to the hospital within 30 days and no documented adverse effects related to antibiotic therapy were noted.
Conclusion: Current prophylactic antibiotic prescribing practices diverge from the current CDC recommendations for the treatment of marine-associated infections, however, an effect secondary to these variations was not observed. Further investigations of prophylaxis against Vibrio infections in low-risk patients is warranted to limit collateral damage and improve antimicrobial stewardship in the ED.
Keywords: antibiotics; emergency medicine; marine; prophylaxis.