Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common after liver transplantation (LT). Induction with interleukin-2 receptor antagonists is often used as a "renal-sparing" strategy. The aim of this study was to assess this approach in a real-world setting in an LT center.
Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of LTs between 2011 and 2018 was performed to assess the impact of a renal-sparing strategy using basiliximab in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids from day 0 post-LT along with delayed introduction of tacrolimus. This was compared with a group receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids from the outset.
Results: The renal-sparing regimen was associated with significantly lower incidence of all-stage AKI at day 7 post-LT (36% vs 55%, P = .006) and less decline in renal function at 3 months (39% vs 57%, P = .01). No further significant differences in renal outcomes were observed at other time points on follow-up to 1 year post-LT. There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute cellular rejection, inpatient length of stay or graft survival. The decision to adopt a renal-sparing regimen was predominantly made on a clinically reactive basis within the first 24 hours post-LT in 77%, and was preordained in 23%. Cost-effectiveness analysis did not find evidence of a significant cost saving when using a renal-sparing strategy.
Conclusion: This study provides real-world analysis of the use of a renal-sparing immunosuppression regimen in LT. Although improvements in incidence of AKI in the short term were demonstrated, this did not translate to cost savings or improved renal outcomes after 3 months.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.